Papers

Bridging Bayesian, frequentist and fiducial (BFF) inferences using confidence distribution

S Thornton, M Xie - arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04464, 2020 - arxiv.org
Statistics paper stat.ME Suggest

… We present a unified platform from which one may compare and combine inference across different paradigms and derive new simulation-based inference approaches. We conclude by …

Cited by Link to paper

BibTeX

@article{2012.04464v3,
Author = {Suzanne Thornton and Minge Xie},
Title = {Bridging Bayesian, frequentist and fiducial (BFF) inferences using confidence distribution},
Eprint = {2012.04464v3},
ArchivePrefix = {arXiv},
PrimaryClass = {stat.ME},
Abstract = {Bayesian, frequentist and fiducial (BFF) inferences are much more congruous than they have been perceived historically in the scientific community (cf., Reid and Cox 2015; Kass 2011; Efron 1998). Most practitioners are probably more familiar with the two dominant statistical inferential paradigms, Bayesian inference and frequentist inference. The third, lesser known fiducial inference paradigm was pioneered by R.A. Fisher in an attempt to define an inversion procedure for inference as an alternative to Bayes' theorem. Although each paradigm has its own strengths and limitations subject to their different philosophical underpinnings, this article intends to bridge these different inferential methodologies through the lenses of confidence distribution theory and Monte-Carlo simulation procedures. This article attempts to understand how these three distinct paradigms, Bayesian, frequentist, and fiducial inference, can be unified and compared on a foundational level, thereby increasing the range of possible techniques available to both statistical theorists and practitioners across all fields.},
Year = {2020},
Month = {Dec},
Url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04464v3},
File = {2012.04464v3.pdf}
}

Share